I went from 1080p to 4k, then later "downgraded" to 1440p because I prefer the higher fps counts it let's me get at the same performance (4k is roughly twice the pixels as 1440p, so you can get roughly double the fps) That means to display 1440p on an 8k screen you just take a 3x3 group of pixels to make one 1440p pixels vs trying to take "1.5 pixels" on a 4k screen to do 1440p which in theory means 1440p on 4k is blurry than 1440p on 8k. Of course, 144 fps at 8k would be even better but that would require 16 times more GPU performance. They are better for gaming due to them usually having a much faster response time and lower input latency, which is one of the most important things in competitive driven casual play.eval(ez_write_tag([[250,250],'planethifi_com-leader-2','ezslot_12',113,'0','0'])); These screen resolutions offer good graphics and efficient working abilities, but you need to consider the budget. While the 4K is the whole new ball in the court. Sure, I could lower the settings, but you're rending 2.25x the pixels as 1440p (at 16:9 anyway) with 4k. In 4k gaming of course.eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'planethifi_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_3',110,'0','0'])); At a glance, we can say that 4K is the best resolution for gaming. I'd drop to 1440p 100% of the time if it meant the difference between 30 and 60fps. A 32″ 1440p monitor has the same “sharpness” as a 24″ 1080p. Blur is, Depends on the game, harder to tell with softer/grainier looking ones. Yeah, I don't think you want 4K on a 27" screen. And a 3860×2160 (4K) resolution means 3860 pixels width and 2160 pixels height (8). Depends on the screen size, but yeah you can tell the difference, especially with games. Anyway, if you have decided to utilize a 4K monitor, you would not want your PC gaming experience to be limited to 30 FPS no matter how good the visuals are.eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'planethifi_com-leader-1','ezslot_6',111,'0','0'])); So here is where we can see the shortcomings of 4k stand out. Needless to say, 4K games obviously look much sharper and much more detailed. We review all kinds of audio and video gear with complete independence from the manufacturer. I gotta say, on the C9, things look pretty smooth @ 120Hz. A gamer will need 60 FPS minimum. Theres a level of extreme sharpness. where the Modi 3 behaves as an entry-level DAC. I have 20/15 vision in both eyes (due to surgery), so I'm definitely not blind. We have studied 1080p resolution in this article. By the way if you're on PC there's also 2880x1620p which is an in between resolution I rarely hear mentioned which scales nicely and is nowhere near the cost of 4K either. In our reviews of AV receivers, we can recommend you to read some of our favorites, the ones that we liked the most, and trying to make the list short, we have the Denon AVR-X2500H, the Onkyo TX-NR686. Regarding speakers, we have reviewed tiny bookshelf-speaker devices to large towers. Given I write a lot of reviews here at KitGuru, as part of that I spend a lot of time in Photoshop editing the photos I take myself. The resolution of a monitor is the amount of width and height in pixels (7). 4K or Ultra HD has a resolution of 3840 x 2160, which is a much higher pixel count than your standard 1080p monitor. We have a technical vademecum where we discuss industry terminology and how it can be useful for you. So if you want to edit and design efficiently and do work for the office, while also having access to a good gaming experience, then 1440p is the way to go. We want to create an inspiring environment for our members and have defined a set of guidelines. A tv screen people are sitting about 1.5x times the diagonal size of the tv( so 55 inch is about 2 meters). Where 4K is one of the latest resolution standards, the upgraded version is also introduced which is named 8K. Hi Guys, I am going to be buying a new pc and looking at a single GTX 1080 graphics card. Refresh rate: … One of those scenarios entails if you have a 4k gaming console if you want to watch 4k blu-ray or stream from sites such as Netflix or Amazon in 4k. At 1.5 meters I could probably tell the difference. Quite often I find myself bumping newer titles down to 1800p just to eke out the extra performance it offers, and I can. Did you read the opening post? 1440p vs 4K is likely going to be more noticeable there. Not because of the colours – but becau… A 2560×1440 (1440P) resolution means the width is 2560 pixels and the height is 1440 pixels. If you are an editor or designer, screen real estate makes a big difference when it comes to workflow. It doesn't really look much. Even games still will not scale, making menus and tasks pretty hard to utilize when we are trying to determine what you are clicking. However, you will depend on very strong hardware (large monitor, strong graphics card, strong CPU, and high refresh rates) to withstand the requirements of gaming in 4K. I have 2 gaming PCs, have no need for another one, I'll buy a PS5 for the exclusives. The main difference in cost between 1440P and 4K gaming, though, really comes down to the GPU that is necessary to run each resolution at acceptable framerates. Also, not sure what GPU you got, but 4K is crazy intensive and you will need a 1080 Ti or above to be comfortable. Apart from that, it’s not worth requiring a 4k resolution. JavaScript is disabled. I can tell the difference. That person's pixels are also four times the size of mine though. Switching back to 1080p or even 1440p looks slightly flat in comparison. This person uses a 4ktv and sit at "semi" normal viewing distance. there is a difference between 1440p + 2160p. If I can't get 4k 60 I drop to 3200x1800p. Also, we have reviewed some interesting DAC: The Elgar Plus from dCS, and the Schiit stack. I would say the smallest TV for 4K at a living room sitting distance should be 65" though. I’m almost sure all users will prefer over a hundred FPS and 1440p, an already high resolution, more than 60 FPS at 4k.eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'planethifi_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_11',112,'0','0'])); Nevertheless, I can definitely recommend a 4k display over a 1440p in a few scenarios. I do most of my PC gaming on a 4K TV. In the comparison 1440p vs 4K, we can define that 4K resolution is superior to 1440p (1) as it has more pixels (6) that are the objective measure to determine the technical difference under examination (4). I think he is, but your forgetting one thing, with monitors you tent to sit close to. Selected examples are the definition of PCM audio, then comes the comparison between PCM and Bitstream, the comparison between DTS Neo 2.5 and Dolby Digital, and the process to match amplifiers to speakers. You could say it is a better user experience. Writing about audio and video is the most fun activity that we can have. You can fit much more in the screen, and you can multitask more efficiently.eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'planethifi_com-box-4','ezslot_4',108,'0','0'])); This applies to users in all areas: YouTubers, office workers, and designers. I'm playing shadow of the tomb raider at 1656p and it looks great. 4k pros: The screen real estate: the screen real estate is four times the amount of pixels than 1080p. 1440p vs 1080p, 4k, 720p, or whatever resolution we can discuss, does not tell us alone, neither which has a better picture definition nor how a sharp a picture on the monitor is. When talking about gaming, then it becomes essential to consider a screen resolution that is important. Smooth, yes, but there is visible blur still present. Upgrading to a 4K UHD display from 1080p or even 1440p may also take some time getting used to as even on a 32-inch screen, the 4K resolution provides you with a high pixel density making everything on your desktop tiny. I struggle to see the difference on a 27 monitor. If you get a 4k display and you have intended to gaming on it you’re in for a real treat because 4k gaming is great as we already mentioned before you have to get a display that is big enough to reap the benefits of 4k gaming on a 40-inch display sitting close to it I can see the benefits and they are clear. I can definitely tell the difference between 1080p and 1440p and 1440p and 4k. In-game, i can't even see the difference between 1080p and 1440p in RE7 at least I could easily see the difference between 1440p and 4k in games However, despite all the positives of 4K, We have to analyze in detail many aspects. In Planet HiFi I test gear during a couple of days and write a review. In fact, sharpness means PPI (pixels per inch). Cases Where 4K Resolution Is Clearly The Best Option. We also have reviewed completely the Denon 8K receivers where we have studied the 8K Denon AVR-X2700H, the Denon AVC-X6700H, the AVC-X4700H, and the AVC-X3700H.eval(ez_write_tag([[580,400],'planethifi_com-leader-4','ezslot_15',115,'0','0'])); If you are into amplifiers, my favorite is the McIntosh MA9000, and that is why I would like to recommend you to read that review. Even on my 40-inch display, I’ve had to set the scaling to 150% for it to be usable and this just doesn’t work for applications a lot of programs. Updated August 11, 2018 4 Comments. I can honestly tell the difference, but it's not big enough to bother me. If OP sits 1.5m from a screen that's four times the size of the one I sit 0.5m from, is it really going to be taking up much less space in his field of vision? 1080p and 1440p are the resolutions most widely adopted by everyone these days whether it be on TVs (for example Pioneer Kuro) or monitors for games. it's pretty damn easy to see, this thread is full of obvious hyperbole. In a world where 2K monitors, 4K monitors, ... Reddit user u/PsychoticHeroBoy posts an image of The Witcher 3 on a 4K monitor. For that size you are better with 1440p. I work as an audio engineer and audio technician. You need also a capable GPU, otherwise, be prepared to lose interest in modern titles as just you will not be able to run them on your 4k TV or monitor. As we pointed out in our 4K vs. 1080p gaming showdown, 1440p is a happy middle ground between smoothness and fidelity for most folks with a good gaming PC. These values, make text completely unreadable without scaling a lot, with many other things such as icons and even entire webpages that are rendered unusable. So we studied 720p, how to scale it to 1080p the right way, and compared 1080p with 1440p and demonstrated why 1440p is not always better. Radeon Image Sharpening works really well to upscale from 1800p, but I only use it in games that rely on TAA or FXAA. In the comparison 1440p vs 4K, we can define that 4K resolution is superior to 1440p (1) as it has more pixels (6) that are the objective measure … This is on a 2070 super. Likewise, we had the urge to compare 1440k with 4K and try to find out how much are we gaining with the change.eval(ez_write_tag([[250,250],'planethifi_com-leader-3','ezslot_14',116,'0','0'])); Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. I can tell but it doesn’t really matter to me. 4k makes everything run smoother for you I guess. This is Planet HiFi. I still play PC games at 1440p because I prefer higher fps over pixels. Checkerboard is far worse than 1440p as soon as the image starts to move. A happy medium place between all resolutions currently seems to be 1440p. The older 720p resolution was analyzed in this article, along with its upscale to 1080p.eval(ez_write_tag([[336,280],'planethifi_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_5',107,'0','0'])); The 1440p monitor resolution is also known as QHD, WQHD, or Quad HD, while the 4K has alternative names like UHD, Ultra HD, or 2160P. The best way I can describe the difference is that native 4K games almost look like they're in 3D because of the amount of depth the image has. With that said, we define that for certain user requirements (5) 1440p is the best option when we study the relationship between the costs and benefits (3), while 4K stands as the best option for some profiles of gamers, cinema, and television streaming as it fulfills better their user requirements (2).eval(ez_write_tag([[580,400],'planethifi_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_1',106,'0','0'])); In this 1440p vs 4K discussion, we will describe which is the best option for each type of user, as we describe below. I have the ASUS ROG Swift monitor and with 2-way SLI on 980s, I have a pretty tough time getting past 60-70fps at max settings at 1440p.