blizzard rustler 10 weight
But there are plenty of skis in this class that are notably softer than the Rustler 10. Weight. But, again, the Rustler 10’s rocker profile is more similar to more playful skis than it is to more traditional, directional ones. One of the more notable features is that the waist width increases as the length of the ski increases. The new Rustler 10 returns unchanged for 20/21, apart from graphics. Following a super intensive prototyping and testing process, the end result is all new shapes, new materials, and new/unique const Well, Blizzard says that the new version of the ski is supposed to be more stable at speed, while still retaining much of the playfulness and accessibility of the previous version. 1980 & 2016 – Liberty Origin 106, 187 cm But for those who want a playful ski that’s still strong, or those directional skiers looking for a more playful alternative to their more traditional skis, that’s where I think the Rustler 10 makes sense. Thanks for a quick reply. The Rustler 10 is stable, yet nimble, so you can approach lines with confidence. With its soft cambered, double rocker profile, it's responsive and stable, yet fun in softer snow and on all types of terrain. I received no help from the Blizzard warranty department. For the “playful” ski, I was considering the armada arv86. 2020 Blizzard Rustler 10. It’s founded on two signature concepts: Carbon Flipcore D.R.T Technology and an innovative waist design. I also have a Blizzard Bonafid in a 187 and a Head Kore 105 in a 189. Also K2 Wayback 96 looks good, but these are maybe too light and soft. 116 mm underfoot, some tip and tail rocker, no concessions on weight, and simply a ski that you can win the Freeride World Tour on. It feels great on the line. The Rustlers will lack the mass of the 0n3p. (But with some caveats.). Modelyear: 2019. My current skis are Atomic Vantage 100 CTI 180cm. If you have any other questions, let me know. I’m 6’2”, 175lb, and I ski fairly aggressively in Colorado. 20 watching. Black Crows. Hi Luke, I am looking for a stiff all-mountain skis for short back country trips (weight around 1700-1900 grams). In a departure from their usual robust and aggressive style of making skis, the Blizzard Rustler 11 is notably softer and more accessible than the other “big” skis that they produce. For next season (2020-2021), the ski will return unchanged apart from graphics. I like big, fast, carvy turns, and am about Jonathan’s size, albeit an inch taller. Skiers looking for a versatile all-mountain ski with a high performance ceiling, but one that's less demanding than skis with full sheets of metal, less rocker, or a stiffer flex will be psyched with the Rustler … the rustler10 shape looks pretty standard. Given the (unexpected and somewhat disappointing) experience you had on these, my first thought probably should have been to move the bindings back a bit, say 1-2 cm. The Rustler 10 was only a handful of points shy of the winning the Editors' Choice Award but did earn one of our Top Picks for a soft snow … I’d like to know your opinion about two different skis I’m looking at.There’s the Blizzard Rustler 10 in 172cm and the Salomon QST 99 in 174cm. Whatever the conditions, with the Rustler 10 you’ll be grinning all day long. Thanks nick. And compared to many of the more rockered, softer, freestyle-oriented skis out there, the Rustler 10 feels more solid and supportive on landings (particularly if you land backseat). The flex pattern of the 19/20 Rustler 10 does not feel very different compared to the 17/18–18/19 Rustler 10. All in all, I’d say all of that translates to the new Rustler 10. Measure (Tip/Waist/Tail): 133/102/123 mm Turning radius: 17.50 m Weight: 1850 gram (180 cm) Sizes: 164,172,180,188 cm. $349.00. 132 - 102 - 122 Test Locations: Big Sky MT, Stowe VT, Aspen CO, Red Mountain BC. The narrowest of the Rustler series, the Rustler 9 is a freeride ski that doesn’t require a big powder day to do its job. Whatever the conditions, with the Blizzard Rustler 10 Freeride skis you’ll be grinning all day long. The Blizzard Rustler 10 Skis + Look Pivot 12 GW Bindings got some minor tweaks last season, primarily aimed at making the ski more stable at speed and a bit less "reactive" to turn input. It was very soft and forgiving, so much that I felt it really didn’t “give me anything”. I would not recommend the new Rustler 10 to people whose top priority is being able to absolutely destroy everything in their path. Conditions: All conditions. The first day we skied on the Blizzard Rustler 10, was a powder day at Stowe about 6 – 8 inches. I was doing some night thinking last night and decided that I want a 2 ski quiver. But when I tried to slither my way through tight moguls from a neutral / centered stance, the Rustler 10’s tails were notably more difficult to slarve around (i.e., they felt a bit “grabby”). We don’t have the two in equal lengths so I can’t so much about stability, but I think I’d take the 9 in an equal length for skiing fast on firmer conditions, while I’d opt for the 10 for skiing fast through softer, choppier conditions. 3 . Skis Tested: Blizzard Rustler 9 188cm (127.5-94-117 mm at 180cm length) Date: January 2020. Have you had a chance to ride the new version?Do you think it’s worth the wait? The Blizzard Rustler 10 is back to dominate another season as a ripping ride for strong intermediate to experts who want power and stability in a lightweight package. thanks for review When we refer to the “previous” or “old” Rustler 10, we’re talking about the version from the 18/19 and 17/18 seasons when it was lighter (that we reviewed here: https://blisterreview.com/gear-reviews/2017-2018-blizzard-rustler-10). The main change here is the swing weight of the new Rustler 10. I haven’t spent much time on those skis, but from what Jonathan says, I think they’d be less hooky in variable, are quite poppy / playful, and are still reasonably light. The Enforcer 104 is like a damper, more stable Rustler 10 but it’s honestly just as forgiving and playful but with more backbone. https://www.blistergearreview.com/deep-dive/deep-dive-blizzard-rustler-10. Overall, I think the new Blizzard Rustler 10 will be a better resort / inbounds ski for many skiers than the previous iteration. Michael Carroll-Sherwin 's feedback is a perfect example of that idea. And Kara was on the 180 cm version. This past spring, Jonathan Ellsworth, Sam Shaheen, Kara Williard, and I all spent some time on the Rustler 10, so we’ll be offering our initial impressions here, and will be updating this review as we continue to get more time on the ski this season. Blister’s Measured Weight per Ski (188 cm): 1950 & 1977 grams. My thinking is it should make a great one-ski quiver / travel ski. At 102 underfoot, they live in that sweet spot that's big enough to bust through crud and float the powder, but still narrow enough that it's not a chore to toss around edge all day whe Thanks for your advice! The Blizzard Rustler 10 is back to dominate another season as a ripping ride for strong intermediate to experts who want power and stability in a lightweight package. Was everyone on the 188? You can give me your own suggestion. I’m actually quite happy with my 175 masterblasters, so I think the 180s would be the best choice then! The Nomad feels a bit more prone to turning / pulling you across the fall line in particularly weird conditions (e.g., breakable crust) than more tapered skis, but I wouldn’t worry too much about that. For the every-day weapon I was thinking on the Masterblaster I currently own, or switch it to the Rustler 10, Bonafide or Cochise. I could ski basically as fast as I wanted to on the new Rustler 10 in soft, light chop. MSRP $840. You can throw its tails out, but afterward, the ski wants to straighten out pretty quickly. Bindings Used: Marker Griffon Demo Not quite as powerful as some skis out there with more metal and/or with less rocker, but hands-down more playful than those skis. It’s definitely not super burly — its tips and tails are still quite accessible, and it’s significantly softer at the end of the ski compared to more directional skis like the Cochise. Looking for an all-mountain ski that might have some forgiveness in the moguls. For our pairs, the old and new 188 cm Rustler 10 have nearly the exact same measured dimensions (within a tenth of a millimeter). The weight increases slightly each year with lots of skis. Sorry for spamming, but I promise is the very last last question. Designed to give crazy amounts of control and float in the deep stuff, even when it gets steep thanks to Blizzard’s innovative waist concept, where … I demoed the Rustler 10 188cm and the Blizzard Bonafide 187cm back to back on the same run (firm groomer in the shade still) just 20 min apart. My current 97mm skis are some G3 Infidels which are quite damp, I’d like something livelier with a bit of dampness. In one sense the Rustler 10 is a playful, light-weight, energetic soft snow ski with progressive rocker and forgiving tip & tail flex for easy soft snow turn initiation and variable turn shapes. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION: Sandwich Compound Sidewall (QQ)Dynamic Release Technology ... cores that is naturally strong but lightweight are strategically constructed for maximum performance while reducing weight. The longer the ski, the wider the waist, which gives ambitious freeriders and freeride athletes more control and float, even on steep terrain. 2042 & 2069 – Rossignol Soul 7 HD (16/17), 188 cm MSRP $840. They feel extremely similar — the 9 is a bit better on firm snow (slightly better edge hold, easier to get on edge, quicker edge to edge), while the 10 floats better in deep snow and feels a bit easier to pivot. $145.00. Skis Tested: Blizzard Rustler 10, 2020, 2021, 188cm ~104mm. $899.90. The Rustler 10’s rocker profile isn’t quite as traditional, with pretty deep rocker lines at both the tips and tails. Some bigger / more aggressive park skiers might appreciate the stiffer feel of the Rustler 10 (compared to dedicated freestyle skis), but if you want an all-mountain-freestyle ski that’s great in the park, there are lots of better options. • Weight: 2200 g/ski @ 186 cm • Binding: None • Warranty: 1 Year • Offered Sizes: 172, 179, 186, 191 cm • Model Year: 2021 17% off. ... Skier Weight: 210 lbs Skier Ability: Intermediate Ski length Tested: 183 cm. Unfortunately I cannot offer much advice for telemark skis as I’m only experienced with “locked heel” skis, but compared to the Bonafide and Cochise, I think you’ll find the Rustler 10 pretty different (poppier, less damp, less stable at high speeds, and definitely more small-turn oriented). While I still liked the old 188 cm Rustler 10, I think I might now opt for the 180 cm if given a choice. I have only very lightly detuned the tips and tails of the new Rustler 10, and the new version still feels a bit more composed and less hooky when making big turns at speed. It’s definitely not a wide, super-damp carving ski like, say, the old Head Monster 98 or current Kastle MX99, but the new Rustler 10’s combination of decent suspension and lots of energy can be really fun for skiing aggressively on piste. Skier Weight: 165lbs (75kg) Skier Height: 6’1″ (185cm) Boots Used: Dalbello Il Moro. I am 175cm and 76kg (168 lbs) and I really like the speed. The new Rustler 10 is by no means terrifying in these conditions, but it encourages me to slow down more than most other skis that are this heavy, or else its tips would get knocked around by the irregularities in the snow. Last season I spent a few hours on two separate days on a pair of 180mm Rustler 10’s, thought they were great. I’m looking for advice on whether I should get the 172 or 180 Rustler 10’s. By combining what I loved about the 1st Rustler 10 (super energetic, good turn initiation, good edge hold) with a more damp construction, the new Rustler 10 is now one of my personal favorite carvers in the ~104mm-wide class. Keep in mind the length differences to try to keep things apples-to-apples. And now, here are our initial on-snow reports from me, Jonathan Ellsworth, Sam Shaheen, and Kara Williard. The only reason that they don't get 5 stars is because I had some delamination in the tails. Rustler 10 2019 Packaged W/ Marker Griffon Bindings Rustler 10 Whatever the conditions, with the Rustler 10 you’ll be grinning all day long. And then the tune also plays a big factor, but after playing with the tune on both iterations of the Rustler 10, that didn’t seem to significantly change the feel of the ski in our experience. 2019 Blizzard Rustler 10. It’s still really energetic, easy to initiate and hold turns on firm snow, and it’s an absolute riot for carving Slalom and GS turns on piste (again, for how wide it is). Great ski! 16 watching. The new version is heavier, coming in at an average weight of 2127 grams per ski for the 188 cm version. Can the 2021 Blizzard Rustler 9 truly do it all? The Rustler series is the Blizzard Freeride range. Now, this ski still only weighs ~2127 grams per ski for the 188 cm length, so there are plenty of heavier, smoother, more “plush” skis that stay more planted. Weight per ski. Following a super intensive prototyping and testing process, the end result is all new shapes, new materials, and new/unique const Phil. Lining up a booter to a stash of pow? FREERIDE / ALL MOUNTAIN SKIS Whatever the conditions, with the Blizzard Rustler 10 you'll have a smile on your face all day long. The ski’s pretty deep rocker lines also make it easy to throw sideways, though, like the old version, the new Rustler 10 doesn’t want to stay in an extended drift. On paper, the skis are close to identical, but the reviews appear quite different. Fortunately, I don’t have much interest in making DH-sized turns around Crested Butte, so this hasn’t really been an issue for me on groomers. There are still many skis that are heavier than the Rustler 10, but the new skis’ weight puts it more in line with dedicated inbounds skis, whereas the previous version’s low weight grouped it in more with 50/50 skis that you’d use inside the resort and in the backcountry. That said, if what you’re really looking for is a more maneuverable / easier ski in tight spaces than the Masterblaster, than the 172 cm Rustler 10 would definitely fill that role. )(for telemark that might be slightly behind alpine). reviewed the previous version of the Rustler 10, https://blisterreview.com/gear-reviews/2017-2018-blizzard-rustler-10. rebound is also important Ripping a groomer back to the chair? Then there is the Rutler 10: much lighter, narrower (104 mm), and with a flatter tail. I wanted a more balanced feel in the air, and moving the bindings +1 cm helped with that. Thank you very much. Thanks. It’s founded on two signature concepts: Carbon Flipcore D.R.T Technology and an innovative waist design. It is founded on two signature concepts, Carbon Flipcore D.R.T Technology and an innovative waist concept: the longer the ski, the wider the waist which gives ambitious freeriders and all mountain skiers more versatility and float, even on steep terrain. Yeah, I have been looking av the CT3.0, but would prefer something less wide, as I have the 116 for deeper days. The Rustler 10 is a steady ride that loves … Are you happy with the 175 cm Masterblaster? The updated Blizzard Rustler 10 takes an easy, playful ski and looks to give it an upgrade in stability. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. We sent three Curated experts out on the slopes at Winter Park Resort, CO to test out the 2021 Rustler 9. (“Dynamic Release Technology”) construction allows the skis to be playful, forgiving and versatile, with ultimate stability underfoot, letting today’s freeride skier play with the terrain and snow any way they want.”. When a steep shot of north-facing terrain is getting chalky, it’ll carve sweet, smooth arcs. I have also looked at the Black Crows Navis, but think it is too stiff in the tail, and has a too long set back for my preference. The Rustler 10 has significantly more tip and tail rocker compared to the Masterblaster (i.e. In the ever-crowded category of 100mm-waisted all-mountain skis, the Rustler 10 continues to be at the top of our lists year after year. It’s usually a combination of many things, but the Rustler 10 is a bit of an outlier. 2021. Is the extra 200g really that important for touring? Thanks Luke, much appreciated. Felt as versatile as my S7s, but with better stability. One for every day charging (I love bumps, trees and hitting steeps and cliffs) that may handle the occasional powder days, while the other one to be a more jibby and all around playful ski.